Silvester wrote:OK, that makes sense.
Err... should have qualified that, might have been seen as impolite
I wasn't sure if it was a hardware problem, that it was 2.17c made sense.
I've had a look and the associated MDV routines in 1.36 and 2.17 are identical. The RAM driver code is completely different, 2.17 looks like an early version of SMSQ/E level 2 RAM driver. Need to delve deeper into inner workings of 2.17 RAM driver.