Reverse engineering rare hardware

Nagging hardware related question? Post here!
JonB
Bent Pin Expansion Port
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:44 pm

Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by JonB »

Any idea if there are efforts afoot to reverse engineer some of the more sought after QL expansions?

I'm thinking Trump cards specifically. I haven't seen any circuit diagrams but they must be reasonably simple, given the technology of the time. I'd like to see something like the UltraSatan which is a hard drive emulator for Atari STs with memory expansion, but I'd settle for a straight Trump Card emulation. I'm not sure how economically viable it would be, but think of the service done to the community (keeping the QL going)!

Everyone knows how unreliable microdrives are getting with age. Even a reconditioned one (new pad, retensioned pad spring) which I've used no more than ten times is showing signs of wear (the pad is disintegrating). Isn't it time for a simple slot in card reader (with additional memory)?

So, has anyone tried to do this, or is trying.. Or are we doomed to carry on chasing after these rare (and costly) 3rd party add ons?


User avatar
Dave
SandySuperQDave
Posts: 2778
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:52 am
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by Dave »

I have been steadily working on this. Currently I have a SRAM memory expansion prototype, working floppy expansion based on the Sandy SuperQBoard, and the big one is a complete QL replacement board with 24 MHz 68020, on-board floppy, IDE and tons of RAM.

These will take a while, and nothing's guaranteed, but they're the best efforts going on right now.


JonB
Bent Pin Expansion Port
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:44 pm

Re: Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by JonB »

The replacement board is quite an achievement, but then it ceases to be a QL.


User avatar
Dave
SandySuperQDave
Posts: 2778
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:52 am
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by Dave »

I think it ceases to be a QL when it ceases to run QL Pawn ;)

More seriously though... In a real sense the board I'm playing with is a real QL. It's simply a QL re-implemented with the exact same custom logic and a mostly-the-same CPU, with the commonest expansions inbuilt. It doesn't make sense to design individual cards for these, alas, unless at least 50 or 100 can be sold. Is a SGC/Aurora combo not a QL?

Do you think there's a market for 50 of anything these days? If you make 50 or 100, you'll sell three or four quickly, but it will take many years to sell the remainder.


User avatar
tofro
Font of All Knowledge
Posts: 2702
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:53 pm
Location: SW Germany

Re: Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by tofro »

Dave, Jon,

I agree with Dave - If it run's QL software, it's a QL. If it even lives in a black box, it's a real QL. ;)

Regarding the size of the "market" for replacement boards - 20, 30 maybe? 50 rather not, but depends on price. I'd definitely be your customer for one of them ;)

Why don't you start a web poll?

Tobias


ʎɐqǝ ɯoɹɟ ǝq oʇ ƃuᴉoƃ ʇou sᴉ pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ʇxǝu ʎɯ 'ɹɐǝp ɥO
JonB
Bent Pin Expansion Port
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:44 pm

Re: Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by JonB »

Dave

Don't get me wrong, you know I am interested in expanding my QL, and I am happy to consider any of your designs. At the moment it seems my shopping list comprises a Trump card, floppy drive and Minerva ROM.

I have no idea why I like playing with it, but I do. That said, every time I use it a microdrive cartridge jams on me. So getting an alternative storage medium is getting urgent.. I'm running out :(

They seem so expensive though...!


User avatar
Dave
SandySuperQDave
Posts: 2778
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:52 am
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by Dave »

I'm confident a short run of low cost floppy interfaces with 512K of RAM will surface in the next few months from one source or another - there is sufficient demand.


JonB
Bent Pin Expansion Port
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:44 pm

Re: Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by JonB »

You can count me in Dave..!


Nasta
Gold Card
Posts: 444
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:02 am
Location: Zapresic, Croatia

Re: Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by Nasta »

The trumpcard uses a PAL chip (at least the Trumpcard II which uses 256k x 4 RAM chips, so only 6 of them instead of the original 24!). However, you can do better today. The Trumpcard, for instance, uses a counter to generate a refresh address for the RAM, whereas even the 256k x 4 RAMs implement one internally. Also, today 1024k x 4 RAMs are available as well as (actually more commonly) 4096k x 4, so only two are required to cover the entire available memory map and more, which means you actually implement a 'large RAM' and then not use areas of it that are addresses used by the QL itself, but it also makes it possible to use things like video RAM shadowing to get a bit more speed out of the old box.

If static RAM is used, all of this is almost trivial, and in fact it may well be the cheapest to make, as only a single RAM chip is required (there are several types of 1M x 8 SRAM chips around, 5V operated), and a decoder implemented in a small CPLD such as a GAL. It could easily implement all the RAM expansion functions of a Trumpcard including advanced options the Trumpcard did not have such as memory shadowing, and it would take a single free pin and a floppy disc controller (WDC1772) plus two TTL chips to make it a full trumpcard. It would also use a fraction of the power used by a Trumpcard.


Nasta
Gold Card
Posts: 444
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:02 am
Location: Zapresic, Croatia

Re: Reverse engineering rare hardware

Post by Nasta »

Dave wrote:I'm confident a short run of low cost floppy interfaces with 512K of RAM will surface in the next few months from one source or another - there is sufficient demand.
Why not make it two 512k SRAM chips and make it real snazzy - the extra cost is negligible (a WDC1772 costs more second hand than both SRAM chips...) :)


Post Reply