And it is implemented in sQLux as it was so easy, tested with martin's extension!XorA wrote:Ah that timer is nicely in the IO space, so would not be hard to emulate that on sQLux using clock_gettime with the MONOTONIC source!
Search found 1343 matches
- Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:38 am
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: Is SBASIC programming on SMSQE difficult?
- Replies: 86
- Views: 14298
Re: Is SBASIC programming on SMSQE difficult?
- Sun Jan 16, 2022 10:33 am
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: Is SBASIC programming on SMSQE difficult?
- Replies: 86
- Views: 14298
Re: Is SBASIC programming on SMSQE difficult?
Ah that timer is nicely in the IO space, so would not be hard to emulate that on sQLux using clock_gettime with the MONOTONIC source!
- Sun Jan 16, 2022 10:12 am
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: QMAC
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5741
Re: QMAC
My main aim is to rebuild the C68 libraries so I can add functions which are now common to make porting easier. I had noticed that qmac turns up in at least one library! I did that once and wanted to release the result as a complete C68 distribution, but never quite got around to it. Was a bit of w...
- Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:08 am
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: QMAC
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5741
Re: QMAC
But it turns out I don't actually need to cross compile, make on QDOS is actually pretty nice. Well, if it's only that, QMake is even nicer and works with any standard QL link file without additional effort. No that was just a dangerous side quest I found myself on while looking at QMAC macros :-) ...
- Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:10 pm
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: QMAC
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5741
Re: QMAC
But it turns out I don't actually need to cross compile, make on QDOS is actually pretty nice. Of course it is. (After you've catapulted yourselves 20 years back with regards to expectations on make features.) I use it all the time, to make assembly, C and Pascal projects. You have obviously never ...
- Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:12 pm
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: QMAC
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5741
Re: QMAC
If people were wondering what i was playing at.
https://github.com/xXorAa/minerva
But it turns out I don't actually need to cross compile, make on QDOS is actually pretty nice.
Now its as simple to build as
https://github.com/xXorAa/minerva
But it turns out I don't actually need to cross compile, make on QDOS is actually pretty nice.
Now its as simple to build as
Code: Select all
ex make
- Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:48 pm
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: QMAC
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5741
Re: QMAC
I think you are missing the point, getting AN assembler isnt hard, one that understands QMAC macros is harder!Derek_Stewart wrote:Hi
What about: vasm and vlink, they have source available.
- Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:18 pm
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: QMAC
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5741
Re: QMAC
So for a lot of cross compile development the thing we are missing on the host side is a qmac compatible assembler. I am assuming this was written in assembler and we don't have high level source code for it? I'd be happy if there was at least the assembler code ;) Yeah but assembler seems to be yo...
- Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:06 pm
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: QMAC
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5741
Re: QMAC
There is, and also gas from qdos-gcc but that means unmangling the macros.
- Fri Jan 14, 2022 1:48 pm
- Forum: Software & Programming
- Topic: QMAC
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5741
QMAC
So for a lot of cross compile development the thing we are missing on the host side is a qmac compatible assembler.
I am assuming this was written in assembler and we don't have high level source code for it?
I am assuming this was written in assembler and we don't have high level source code for it?